<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nani huyu? &#187; Identity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adam.kuert.net/category/identity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adam.kuert.net</link>
	<description>That's a good question.  I don't think I have an answer yet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:45:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Sync for iPhone</title>
		<link>http://adam.kuert.net/2009/02/23/google-sync-for-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://adam.kuert.net/2009/02/23/google-sync-for-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Identity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adam.kuert.net/?p=262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So if you&#8217;re an iPhone user, you want contact and calendar syncing over-the-air, you don&#8217;t want to pay for Mobileme, and you think Microsoft Exchange server sucks, then you&#8217;re just like me and there&#8217;s a great solution out there for you: Google Sync.  It supports syncing (manual, fetch or push) contacts list and up to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if you&#8217;re an iPhone user, you want contact and calendar syncing over-the-air, you don&#8217;t want to pay for Mobileme, and you think Microsoft Exchange server sucks, then you&#8217;re just like me and there&#8217;s a great solution out there for you: <a href="http://www.google.com/mobile/default/sync.html">Google Sync</a>.  It supports syncing (manual, fetch or push) contacts list and up to 5 calendars via an ActiveSync protocol.  Mail is coming soon (but you can still use IMAP or POP, so I&#8217;m content to wait).  Google Sync is currently in beta, but google betas are fairly stable, and you should have started <a title="Time Machine for Mac" href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/timemachine.html">backing up your data</a> years ago so as to never be totally caught off guard again, so I wouldn&#8217;t worry too much.  I&#8217;ve been using Google Sync for several weeks now and I&#8217;m loving it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://adam.kuert.net/2009/02/23/google-sync-for-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Data Portablility</title>
		<link>http://adam.kuert.net/2008/05/12/data-portablility/</link>
		<comments>http://adam.kuert.net/2008/05/12/data-portablility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 23:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adam.kuert.net/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Facebook released the News Feed they didn&#8217;t decrease anyone&#8217;s privacy.  They simply showed everyone exactly what they were revealing.  Facebook made sharing data so easy that people didn&#8217;t realize what they were sharing.  But micromanaging data online makes people less likely to share.  So where&#8217;s the balance? Flickr uses a term called &#8216;privacy through [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Facebook released the News Feed they didn&#8217;t decrease anyone&#8217;s privacy.  They simply showed everyone exactly what they were revealing.  Facebook made sharing data so easy that people didn&#8217;t realize what they were sharing.  But micromanaging data online makes people less likely to share.  So where&#8217;s the balance?<br />
<span id="more-29"></span><br />
Flickr uses a term called &#8216;privacy through obscurity&#8217; where they make data easy to share privately, but it&#8217;s not actually private.  It&#8217;s the idea of emailing a random URL to a friend.  That friend could, in turn, email the link to the world, but they probably won&#8217;t, cuz you wouldn&#8217;t have send them the link if you thought they would.  And you can always change the URL.</p>
<p>Oauth kind of falls into this bucket.  You can give a third party website a token to access to your data.  In turn, they could share that token with the world.  But they probably won&#8217;t, and you could always change the token.</p>
<p>But how do we define what data is shared?  Let say I have some data, a photo for example.  It has a static amount of value to me living on my computer.  I add that photo to a social network and it accrues new value and new meaning as people comment on the photo.  I can take my photo back, or move it to a new social network, but I can&#8217;t take the comments with me.   And even if I could, should I be able to?  Who owns those comments?  Do I have the right to share those comments with the world?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://adam.kuert.net/2008/05/12/data-portablility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook thinks I&#8217;m gay</title>
		<link>http://adam.kuert.net/2007/12/12/facebook-thinks-im-gay/</link>
		<comments>http://adam.kuert.net/2007/12/12/facebook-thinks-im-gay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 01:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adam.kuert.net/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Someone once asked what business McDonalds is in. The response was predictable, &#8220;they make burgers.&#8221; However the answer is very different: &#8220;We are in the real estate business. The only reason we sell hamburgers is because they are the greatest producer of revenue from which our tenants can pay us rent.&#8221; 1 Similarly, it can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone once asked what business McDonalds is in.  The response was predictable, &#8220;they make burgers.&#8221;   However the answer is very different:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;We are in the real estate business. The only reason we sell <span class="populated">hamburgers</span> is because they are the greatest producer of <span class="populated">revenue</span> from which our <span class="populated">tenants</span> can pay us rent.&#8221;<sup> 1</sup></em></p></blockquote>
<p>Similarly, it can be asked what business Facebook is in and the subsequent response, &#8220;social networking,&#8221; would be misguided.</p>
<p>Facebook is an advertising platform that specializes in targeted advertising.  They gather data about your usage on Facebook (and <a href="http://gigaom.com/2007/11/06/facebook-beacon-privacy-issues/" target="_blank">40+ other sites</a>) in order to server up advertising that you&#8217;re more likely to click on.</p>
<p><a href="http://adam.kuert.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/picture-1.png" title="Facebook gay advertising"><img src="http://adam.kuert.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/picture-1.thumbnail.png" alt="Facebook gay advertising" align="left" /></a></p>
<p>So here&#8217;s the kicker&#8230;today I saw an ad for &#8220;the fastest growing gay social network for gay men&#8221; on my Facebook profile.  So this brings me to one of two conclusions: One, Facebook thinks I&#8217;m gay.  Or Two, Facebook thinks that people who look at my profile are gay.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mind advertising as a means of sustaining freely available online services, but I never signed up for sexual or provocative advertising.  And I&#8217;m not about to start clicking on it, so it&#8217;s a waste of my time and their money to show it to me.</p>
<p>I was once so proud of Facebook.   But I have been perturbed by recent events.  I currently work for a company whose primary business model is advertising.  And I hope that my disgust with Facebook will help shape our companies future for everyone&#8217;s best interests.</p>
<p>1. <a href="http://everything2.com/index.pl?node=mcdonald's" target="_blank">http://everything2.com/index.pl?node=mcdonald&#8217;s</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://adam.kuert.net/2007/12/12/facebook-thinks-im-gay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who holds your identity?</title>
		<link>http://adam.kuert.net/2007/12/08/who-holds-your-identity/</link>
		<comments>http://adam.kuert.net/2007/12/08/who-holds-your-identity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 06:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Identity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adam.kuert.net/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I finally got around to installing my very own WordPress blog. Not that I&#8217;m actually going to use this thing, but it might be nice since that whole xanga thing died out. Wow, that was short lived. I remember all my friends were screaming, &#8220;you gotta get a xanga account&#8221; So I set one up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally got around to installing my very own WordPress blog.  Not that I&#8217;m actually going to use this thing, but it might be nice since that whole xanga thing died out.  Wow, that was short lived.  I remember all my friends were screaming, &#8220;you gotta get a xanga account&#8221;   So I set one up and 2 yrs later none of them use it any more.  Now they&#8217;re saying, &#8220;you gotta get a Facebook account.&#8221; Fads.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re just passing out control of our identity to whoever shakes the newest shiny trinket in our face.  I believe that my identity should be in my hands.  Or at least, I should have some control over it.</p>
<p>The problem with the online world, currently, is that controlling your identity and establishing community are at odds with each other.  It doesn&#8217;t have to be that way.  We just need a new model of identity discovery that allows the users to maintain his/her identity as they choose to share, or not to share, it with the world.  Unfortunately, it seems most people don&#8217;t really want that kind of responsibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://adam.kuert.net/2007/12/08/who-holds-your-identity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
